{"id":23979,"date":"2026-08-24T16:09:43","date_gmt":"2026-08-24T13:09:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/?p=23979"},"modified":"2026-08-27T14:06:30","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T11:06:30","slug":"uz-maqola-rad-etilish-sabablari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/uz-maqola-rad-etilish-sabablari\/","title":{"rendered":"Scopus jurnalida maqola nega rad etiladi: 6 ta asosiy sabab va ularni qanday oldini olish mumkin"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n
\n

Scopus jurnaliga maqola yubordingiz, ammo tahririyatdan rad javobini oldingizmi? Bunday holat ko\u2018plab tadqiqotchilarga tanish: qo\u2018lyozmani tayyorlashga oylar sarflanadi, biroq jurnalni noto\u2018g\u2018ri tanlash, ilmiy yangilikning yetarlicha aniq ko\u2018rsatilmasligi, abstract, til yoki rasmiy talablar bilan bog\u2018liq muammolar sabab maqola retsenziyagacha yoki retsenziyadan keyin rad etilishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

Ushbu maqolada Scopus jurnallarida maqolalar rad etilishining 6 ta universal sababini ko\u2018rib chiqamiz va rad javobi xavfini kamaytirish uchun topshirishdan oldin nimalarni tekshirish kerakligini tushuntiramiz.<\/p>\n

95-98% gacha<\/strong> Q1 Scopus jurnallarida topshirilgan qo\u2018lyozmalar rad etiladi<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Maqolaning rad etilishi ilmiy nashr jarayonining odatiy qismidir<\/h2>\n

Birinchi navbatda shuni tushunish kerak: rad javobi ilmiy jarayonning standart qismi bo\u2018lib, tadqiqotning ilmiy qiymati yo\u2018q degani emas.<\/p>\n

Q2 jurnallarida topshirilgan qo\u2018lyozmalarning 85-95% i, Q3 jurnallarida 70-85% i, Q4 jurnallarida esa 55-70% i rad etiladi. Hatto nisbatan qulayroq jurnallarda ham maqolalarning katta qismi tahririy saralashdan o\u2018tmaydi.<\/p>\n

Barcha rad javoblarining 30-78% i qo\u2018lyozmani birorta ham retsenzent ko\u2018rishidan oldin yuz beradi.<\/strong> Bu desk rejection, ya\u2019ni muharrir maqolani tashqi retsenziyaga yubormaslik haqida qaror qabul qiladi.<\/p>\n

Shuning uchun rad etilish sabablarining bir qismini maqolani yuborishdan oldin aniqlash va bartaraf etish mumkin. Quyida eng universal 6 ta sababni ko\u2018rib chiqamiz.<\/p>\n

\n

Maqola jurnal mavzusiga mos kelmaydi<\/h3>\n

Scopus jurnalida maqola rad etilishining eng keng tarqalgan sabablaridan biri - maqola mavzusining jurnalning ilmiy yo\u2018nalishiga mos kelmasligi.<\/p>\n

Jurnalning rasmiy Aims & Scope bo\u2018limi maqola mavzusiga mos kelishini baholash uchun birinchi manbadir. Biroq faqat shu bo\u2018lim bilan cheklanmaslik kerak: jurnalning so\u2018nggi nashrlari va tahrir hay\u2019ati tarkibi uning amaldagi ilmiy fokusini yaxshiroq ko\u2018rsatadi.<\/p>\n

Agar maqola jurnal uchun mavzu jihatidan begona bo\u2018lsa, qo\u2018lyozma hatto retsenziya bosqichiga yetmasdan rad etilishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/strong><\/p>\n

  1. Jurnalning Aims & Scope bo\u2018limini diqqat bilan o\u2018qing.<\/li>
  2. So\u2018nggi 12-18 oyda chop etilgan maqolalarni ko\u2018rib chiqing.<\/li>
  3. Sizning mavzuingizga yaqin tadqiqotlar jurnalda muntazam chop etilayotganiga ishonch hosil qiling.<\/li><\/ol>\n

    Ilmiy yangilik va tadqiqot darajasi yetarli emas<\/h3>\n

    Maqola jurnal mavzusiga mos kelishi mumkin, ammo agar unda aniq ilmiy yangilik bo\u2018lmasa yoki tadqiqot mavjud ishlarga nisbatan yetarli darajada yangi natija bermasa, tahririyat uni rad etishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

    Muammo ko\u2018pincha tadqiqot sifatsizligida emas, balki maqolada uning ilmiy hissasi yetarlicha aniq ko\u2018rsatilmaganida bo\u2018ladi.<\/p>\n

    Ushbu tadqiqot mavjud bilimlarga aynan nima qo\u2018shadi?<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/strong><\/p>\n

    1. Introduction bo\u2018limida research gapni aniq ko\u2018rsating.<\/li>
    2. Tadqiqotingiz avvalgi ishlardan nimasi bilan farq qilishini tushuntiring.<\/li>
    3. Asosiy ilmiy hissani aniq va qisqa shaklda ifodalang.<\/li>
    4. Discussion bo\u2018limida natijalarning mavjud tadqiqotlardan farqini ko\u2018rsating.<\/li><\/ol>\n

      Abstract zaif yoki jurnal talablariga mos rasmiylashtirilmagan<\/h3>\n

      Abstract muharrir maqola bilan tanishganda birinchi bo\u2018lib ko\u2018radigan qismlardan biridir. Agar u tadqiqot maqsadini, metodini, asosiy natijalarni va ilmiy ahamiyatini aniq ko\u2018rsatmasa, maqola haqida salbiy dastlabki taassurot paydo bo\u2018lishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

      Muammo faqat mazmunda emas. Ayrim jurnallar structured abstract talab qiladi, boshqalari esa so\u2018zlar soni, bo\u2018limlar tartibi yoki kalit so\u2018zlar formatiga qat\u2019iy talab qo\u2018yadi. Ushbu talablarning buzilishi ham qo\u2018lyozmaning qayta ishlashga yuborilishiga yoki rad etilishiga sabab bo\u2018lishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

      Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/strong><\/p>\n

      1. Abstractda tadqiqot maqsadi, metod, asosiy natijalar va ilmiy ahamiyat aniq ko\u2018rsatilganiga ishonch hosil qiling.<\/li>
      2. Jurnalning abstract formatiga qo\u2018ygan talablarini alohida tekshiring.<\/li>
      3. So\u2018zlar soni, structured\/unstructured format va kalit so\u2018zlar bo\u2018yicha talablarni bajaring.<\/li>
      4. Abstractning maqolaning boshqa bo\u2018limlariga mazmunan mosligini tekshiring.<\/li><\/ol>\n

        Akademik ingliz tili sifati yetarli emas<\/h3>\n

        Maqolaning ilmiy mazmuni kuchli bo\u2018lishi mumkin, ammo matn murakkab, noaniq yoki grammatik va uslubiy xatolarga boy bo\u2018lsa, muharrir va retsenzentlar tadqiqot mazmunini to\u2018liq baholay olmasligi mumkin.<\/p>\n

        Muammo muallifning ingliz tilini ona tili sifatida bilmasligida emas. Asosiy xavf - so\u2018zma-so\u2018z tarjima, murakkab jumlalar, terminlarning bir xil qo\u2018llanmasligi va akademik uslubning yetarli darajada shakllanmaganidir.<\/p>\n

        Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/strong><\/p>\n

        1. Maqolani faqat grammatik xatolar uchun emas, academic English nuqtai nazaridan ham tekshiring.<\/li>
        2. Terminologiya maqola davomida bir xil qo\u2018llanilganiga ishonch hosil qiling.<\/li>
        3. Juda uzun va murakkab jumlalarni soddalashtiring.<\/li>
        4. Imkon bo\u2018lsa, topshirishdan oldin matnni ilmiy maqolalar bilan ishlaydigan mutaxassisga tekshirtiring.<\/li><\/ol>\n

          Tizim natijani baholaydi, ammo unga qanday erishishni kamdan-kam tushuntiradi. Maqolani chop etishdan dissertatsiyani himoya qilishgacha bo\u2018lgan yo\u2018l haqida Telegram kanalimizda so\u2018zlab beramiz.<\/p>\u2192 Kanalga obuna bo\u2018lish<\/a><\/div>

          \"QR-\u043a\u043e\u0434<\/a>Kanalga o'tish uchun buni skanerlang<\/span><\/div><\/div>\n

          Zarur qo\u2018shimcha hujjatlar taqdim etilmagan<\/h3>\n

          Ba\u2019zi Scopus jurnallari maqolaning o\u2018zi bilan birga qo\u2018shimcha hujjatlarni ham talab qiladi. Masalan, cover letter, author contribution statement, conflict of interest declaration, etik ruxsat yoki boshqa tasdiqlovchi ma\u2019lumotlar.<\/p>\n

          Agar talab qilingan hujjatlardan biri yetishmasa yoki noto\u2018g\u2018ri rasmiylashtirilsa, maqola tahririy jarayonning dastlabki bosqichidayoq qaytarilishi yoki rad etilishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

          Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/strong><\/p>\n

          1. Jurnalning Guide for Authors bo\u2018limini to\u2018liq tekshiring.<\/li>
          2. Maqolaga qo\u2018shilishi kerak bo\u2018lgan barcha hujjatlar ro\u2018yxatini oldindan tayyorlang.<\/li>
          3. Conflict of interest, author contribution va etik ruxsatga oid talablarni alohida tekshiring.<\/li>
          4. Maqolani yuborishdan oldin barcha zarur fayllar to\u2018liq va to\u2018g\u2018ri yuklanganiga ishonch hosil qiling.<\/li><\/ol>\n

            Maqola jurnalning rasmiylashtirish talablariga mos kelmaydi<\/h3>\n

            Har bir jurnal maqola tuzilishi va rasmiylashtirilishiga o\u2018z talablarini qo\u2018yadi. Noto\u2018g\u2018ri shablon, mos kelmaydigan iqtibos uslubi, talabga javob bermaydigan jadval yoki rasmlar, shuningdek fayl formatidagi xatolar qo\u2018lyozmaning dastlabki tekshiruvdan o\u2018tmasligiga sabab bo\u2018lishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

            Ba\u2019zan tadqiqot ilmiy jihatdan kuchli bo\u2018lsa ham, texnik talablarning buzilishi muharrir uchun qo\u2018shimcha ish yaratadi va maqolaning qaytarilishiga yoki rad etilishiga olib keladi.<\/p>\n

            Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/strong><\/p>\n

            1. Jurnalning rasmiy maqola shablonidan foydalaning.<\/li>
            2. Iqtibos va bibliografiya uslubini Guide for Authors talablariga muvofiq tekshiring.<\/li>
            3. Jadval, rasm, sarlavha va ilovalar jurnal talablariga mos ekaniga ishonch hosil qiling.<\/li>
            4. Submit tugmasini bosishdan oldin barcha texnik talablar bo\u2018yicha yakuniy chek-listdan o\u2018ting.<\/li><\/ol>\n
              \n

              Qisqacha: rad etilishning 6 sababi va ularni qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/h2>\n
              Yo'q.<\/th>Rad etish sababi<\/th>Bosqich<\/th>Qanday oldini olish mumkin<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
              1<\/td>Maqola jurnal mavzusiga mos kelmaydi<\/td>Stol rad etishi<\/td>Aims & Scope va 12-18 oydagi nashrlarni tekshiring<\/td><\/tr>
              2<\/td>Ilmiy yangilik va tadqiqot darajasi yetarli emas<\/td>Desk rejection \/ retsenziya<\/td>Research gap va ilmiy hissani aniq ko\u2018rsating<\/td><\/tr>
              3<\/td>Abstract zaif yoki jurnal talablariga mos rasmiylashtirilmagan<\/td>Stol rad etishi<\/td>Abstract mazmuni va formatini tekshiring<\/td><\/tr>
              4<\/td>Akademik ingliz tili sifati yetarli emas<\/td>Desk rejection \/ retsenziya<\/td>Til va akademik uslubni tahrir qiling<\/td><\/tr>
              5<\/td>Zarur qo\u2018shimcha hujjatlar yo\u2018q<\/td>Retsenziyagacha<\/td>Guide for Authors va barcha fayllarni tekshiring<\/td><\/tr>
              6<\/td>Rasmiylashtirish talablari buzilgan<\/td>Retsenziyagacha<\/td>Rasmiy shablon va texnik chek-listdan foydalaning<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n
              \n

              Xulosa<\/h2>\n

              Hatto kuchli tadqiqot ham maqola jurnal mavzusiga mos kelmasa, ilmiy yangilik yetarlicha aniq ko\u2018rsatilmasa, abstract jurnal talablariga javob bermasa, matnni tushunish qiyin bo\u2018lsa yoki topshirishda texnik talablar e\u2019tibordan chetda qolsa, rad javobini olishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

              Ushbu xatolarning har biri qo\u2018lyozmaning qaytarilishiga yoki to\u2018liq retsenziya bosqichiga yetmasdan desk rejection olinishiga sabab bo\u2018lishi mumkin.<\/p>\n

              Shuning uchun Scopus jurnaliga maqola tayyorlashni yagona jarayon sifatida ko\u2018rish kerak: mos jurnalni tanlashdan va ilmiy mazmunni tekshirishdan boshlab, til sifati, qo\u2018shimcha hujjatlar va yakuniy rasmiylashtirishgacha.<\/p>\n

              Qancha ko\u2018p xavf Topshirish<\/strong>\u00a0tugmasini bosishdan oldin bartaraf etilsa, qo\u2018lyozmaning dastlabki saralashdan o\u2018tib, retsenzentlarga yuborilish ehtimoli shuncha yuqori bo\u2018ladi.<\/p>\n

              Rad etilishning ayrim sabablarini mustaqil tekshiruv vaqtida payqash qiyin. Qo\u2018lyozmada barcha talablar hisobga olinganiga ishonchingiz komil emasmi?<\/p>

              Maqolangiz va tanlangan jurnalni tahlil qilamiz, asosiy xavflar hamda keyingi qadamlarni belgilaymiz.<\/strong><\/p>

              \u2192 Konsultatsiyaga yozilish<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              \u0412\u044b \u043e\u0442\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044e \u0432 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b Scopus, \u043d\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u043e\u0442 \u0440\u0435\u0434\u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0438? \u0422\u0430\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430 \u043c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u0438\u043c \u0438\u0441\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f\u043c: \u043d\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u043a\u0443 \u0440\u0443\u043a\u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0438 \u0443\u0445\u043e\u0434\u044f\u0442 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u044f\u0446\u044b, \u043e\u0434\u043d\u0430\u043a\u043e \u0438\u0437-\u0437\u0430 \u043d\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0430, \u0441\u043b\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u0443\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0440\u0433\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438, \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c \u0441 abstract, \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a\u043e\u043c \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u044f \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0442\u043a\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0435\u0449\u0435 \u0434\u043e \u0440\u0435\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0437\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u0433\u043e. \u0412 \u044d\u0442\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043c 6 \u0443\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d \u043e\u0442\u043a\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0439 […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":23998,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-stati-o-skopus"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23979\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23998"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a-articles.uz\/uz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}